Bangladesh vs China: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Bangladesh
0 ha per person
in 2024
China
0 ha per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
31st
China rank
30th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 31st and China ranks 30th of 186 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | China |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | China |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | China |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Bangladesh or China?
- China, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Bangladesh and China?
- 0 ha per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and China?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and China rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 31st and China ranks 30th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.