Canada vs Puerto Rico: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Canada
0 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 ha per person
in 2024
Canada rank
31st
Puerto Rico rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Canada
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 31st and Puerto Rico ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Canada |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Canada |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Canada |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Canada or Puerto Rico?
- Canada, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Canada and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha per person, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Puerto Rico rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Canada ranks 31st and Puerto Rico ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.