Chile vs Panama: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0 ha per person
in 2024
Panama
0 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
18th
Panama rank
21st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Panama, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.7 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 18th and Panama ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Chile or Panama?
- Chile, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Chile and Panama?
- 0 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 18th and Panama ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.