Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Costa Rica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mongolia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
31st
Mongolia rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0 ha per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.