Egypt vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
31st
Eswatini rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Eswatini
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 31st and Eswatini ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Eswatini?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Eswatini?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 31st and Eswatini ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.