Egypt vs Latvia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
31st
Latvia rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Latvia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Latvia?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Latvia?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.