El Salvador vs Kazakhstan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
El Salvador
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
El Salvador rank
31st
Kazakhstan rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- El Salvador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 31st and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0019 ha per person | 0.0019 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, El Salvador or Kazakhstan?
- El Salvador, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Kazakhstan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- El Salvador ranks 31st and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.