Eswatini vs Pakistan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Eswatini
0 ha per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
31st
Pakistan rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Eswatini or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Eswatini and Pakistan?
- 0 ha per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Pakistan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.