Gambia vs Georgia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Gambia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Georgia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
31st
Georgia rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Georgia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Georgia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 31st and Georgia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0033 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0033 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Gambia or Georgia?
- Gambia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Gambia and Georgia?
- 0 ha per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Georgia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Georgia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 31st and Georgia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.