Georgia vs Mali: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Georgia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mali
0 ha per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
31st
Mali rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Mali
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mali, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mali ahead.
Georgia ranks 31st and Mali ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | Mali |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Georgia or Mali?
- Georgia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Georgia and Mali?
- 0 ha per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mali?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Mali rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 31st and Mali ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.