Guinea vs Portugal: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Guinea
0 ha per person
in 2024
Portugal
0 ha per person
in 2024
Guinea rank
31st
Portugal rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Guinea
- Portugal
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Guinea or Portugal?
- Guinea, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Guinea and Portugal?
- 0 ha per person, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Portugal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Portugal rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Guinea ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.