India vs South Sudan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
India
0 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 ha per person
in 2024
India rank
31st
South Sudan rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- India
- South Sudan
How they compare
India currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
India ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, India or South Sudan?
- India, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between India and South Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do India and South Sudan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- India ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.