Israel vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Israel
0 ha per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 ha per person
in 2024
Israel rank
31st
Uruguay rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Israel
- Uruguay
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 31st and Uruguay ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Israel or Uruguay?
- Israel, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Israel and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Israel ranks 31st and Uruguay ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.