Latvia vs Norway: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Norway
0 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
31st
Norway rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Norway
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 31st and Norway ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Latvia or Norway?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Latvia and Norway?
- 0 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 31st and Norway ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.