Latvia vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
31st
Sri Lanka rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 31st and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Latvia or Sri Lanka?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 31st and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.