Lithuania vs Uzbekistan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Lithuania
0 ha per person
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
31st
Uzbekistan rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Lithuania or Uzbekistan?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Lithuania and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Uzbekistan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.