Nepal vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Nepal
0 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha per person
in 2024
Nepal rank
31st
Rwanda rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Nepal
- Rwanda
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 31st and Rwanda ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Nepal or Rwanda?
- Nepal, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Nepal and Rwanda?
- 0 ha per person, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Nepal ranks 31st and Rwanda ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.