New Zealand vs Suriname: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
New Zealand
0 ha per person
in 2024
Suriname
0 ha per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
31st
Suriname rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- New Zealand
- Suriname
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 31st and Suriname ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, New Zealand or Suriname?
- New Zealand, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between New Zealand and Suriname?
- 0 ha per person, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Suriname rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- New Zealand ranks 31st and Suriname ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.