Poland vs Switzerland: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Poland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Switzerland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Poland rank
31st
Switzerland rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Poland
- Switzerland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Switzerland, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 31st and Switzerland ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Poland |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Poland or Switzerland?
- Poland, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Poland and Switzerland?
- 0 ha per person, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Switzerland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Switzerland rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Poland ranks 31st and Switzerland ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.