Puerto Rico vs Slovenia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Puerto Rico
0 ha per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
31st
Slovenia rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Puerto Rico
- Slovenia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Slovenia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Puerto Rico or Slovenia?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 0 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Slovenia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Puerto Rico ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.