Rwanda vs South Sudan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Rwanda
0 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
31st
South Sudan rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.