Rwanda vs Thailand: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Rwanda
0 ha per person
in 2024
Thailand
0 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
31st
Thailand rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Thailand
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Thailand, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 31st and Thailand ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Thailand |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, per capita, Rwanda or Thailand?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, per capita between Rwanda and Thailand?
- 0 ha per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Thailand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Thailand rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 31st and Thailand ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.