Argentina vs Chile: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Argentina
-87.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chile
-66.67 % change on previous year
in 2024
Argentina rank
28th
Chile rank
25th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • Argentina
  • Chile
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Chile currently reports -66.67 % change on previous year against -87.5 % change on previous year in Argentina, a difference of 20.83 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Chile ahead.

Argentina ranks 28th and Chile ranks 25th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 38.72 % change on previous year 22.01 % change on previous year 16.71 % change on previous year Argentina
2000s 43.72 % change on previous year 35.52 % change on previous year 8.2 % change on previous year Argentina
2010s 41.79 % change on previous year 123.81 % change on previous year 82.01 % change on previous year Chile
2020s 211.66 % change on previous year 20.47 % change on previous year 191.18 % change on previous year Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Argentina or Chile?
Chile, at -66.67 % change on previous year against -87.5 % change on previous year in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Argentina and Chile?
20.83 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
30 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Argentina ranks 28th and Chile ranks 25th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Chile: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/argentina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/argentina/chile/">Argentina vs Chile: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.