Australia vs Chile: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Australia
-65.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chile
-66.67 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia rank
23rd
Chile rank
25th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • Australia
  • Chile
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Australia currently reports -65.08 % change on previous year against -66.67 % change on previous year in Chile, a difference of 1.59 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Chile ahead.

Australia ranks 23rd and Chile ranks 25th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chile Difference Ahead
1990s -3.58 % change on previous year 22.01 % change on previous year 25.58 % change on previous year Chile
2000s 63.86 % change on previous year 35.52 % change on previous year 28.34 % change on previous year Australia
2010s 12.32 % change on previous year 112.27 % change on previous year 99.95 % change on previous year Chile
2020s -10.37 % change on previous year 20.47 % change on previous year 30.84 % change on previous year Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Australia or Chile?
Australia, at -65.08 % change on previous year against -66.67 % change on previous year in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Australia and Chile?
1.59 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Australia ranks 23rd and Chile ranks 25th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.