Bahamas vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Bahamas
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Bahamas rank
29th
New Zealand rank
29th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • Bahamas
  • New Zealand
-2000200400199120032016

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Bahamas ranks 29th and New Zealand ranks 29th of 159 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 50.47 % change on previous year 44.39 % change on previous year 6.08 % change on previous year Bahamas
2000s -75.31 % change on previous year 51.55 % change on previous year 126.86 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Bahamas or New Zealand?
Bahamas, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2016.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Bahamas and New Zealand?
0 % change on previous year, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Zealand?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Bahamas and New Zealand rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Bahamas ranks 29th and New Zealand ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/new-zealand/">Bahamas vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.