China, Hong Kong SAR vs New Caledonia: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
29th
New Caledonia rank
29th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • New Caledonia
-100-50050100150199120062022

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 29th of 159 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 5.6 % change on previous year 17.87 % change on previous year 12.28 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s -94.4 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 5.6 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), China, Hong Kong SAR or New Caledonia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between China, Hong Kong SAR and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and New Caledonia?
10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and New Caledonia rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs New Caledonia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/new-caledonia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs New Caledonia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.