Eswatini vs Lithuania: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Lithuania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Eswatini rank
29th
Lithuania rank
29th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lithuania
-2000200400199120052020

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lithuania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lithuania ahead.

Eswatini ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 29th of 159 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 26.14 % change on previous year 3.44 % change on previous year 22.7 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 163.13 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 213.13 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Eswatini or Lithuania?
Eswatini, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Eswatini and Lithuania?
0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lithuania?
9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2001.
How do Eswatini and Lithuania rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Eswatini ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Lithuania: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/lithuania/">Eswatini vs Lithuania: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.