What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?

0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?

9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Libya

-100 % change on previous year

in 2000

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

-100 % change on previous year

in 2001

Libya rank

29th

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank

29th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

Libya
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

How they compare

Libya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Libya ranks 29th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 29th of 159 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Libya or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?: Libya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2000.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?: 0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?: 9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
How do Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?: Libya ranks 29th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/libya/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/libya/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Libya vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.