Mexico vs Zambia: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Mexico
-46.83 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
-3.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mexico rank
20th
Zambia rank
17th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • Mexico
  • Zambia
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports -3.07 % change on previous year against -46.83 % change on previous year in Mexico, a difference of 43.76 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zambia ahead.

Mexico ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 17th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 24.04 % change on previous year 21.06 % change on previous year 2.97 % change on previous year Mexico
2000s 112.39 % change on previous year -10.66 % change on previous year 123.05 % change on previous year Mexico
2010s 97.78 % change on previous year -0.597 % change on previous year 98.38 % change on previous year Mexico
2020s -30.3 % change on previous year -2.4 % change on previous year 27.9 % change on previous year Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Mexico or Zambia?
Zambia, at -3.07 % change on previous year against -46.83 % change on previous year in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Mexico and Zambia?
43.76 % change on previous year, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Mexico and Zambia rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Mexico ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 17th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Zambia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mexico/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mexico/zambia/">Mexico vs Zambia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.