What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe?

15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe?

9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

-100 % change on previous year

in 2001

Zimbabwe

-84.05 % change on previous year

in 2024

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank

29th

Zimbabwe rank

26th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 15.95 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 159 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe?: 15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe?: 9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?: Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/zimbabwe/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.