Papua New Guinea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual

Papua New Guinea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
29th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
29th

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 29th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 29th of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 95.15 % change on previous year 50.74 % change on previous year 44.41 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2000s -72.73 % change on previous year -62.53 % change on previous year 10.2 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -100 % change on previous year -42.86 % change on previous year 57.14 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Papua New Guinea or United Republic of Tanzania?
Papua New Guinea, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Papua New Guinea and United Republic of Tanzania?
0 % change on previous year, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and United Republic of Tanzania?
13 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2016.
How do Papua New Guinea and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Papua New Guinea ranks 29th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/papua-new-guinea/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/papua-new-guinea/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Papua New Guinea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 3,610 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.