Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual
Russian Federation
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-84.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … annual over time
- Russian Federation
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Russian Federation, a difference of 15.95 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 159 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 126.62 % change on previous year | -7.5 % change on previous year | 134.12 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 53.39 % change on previous year | -3.01 % change on previous year | 56.41 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 46.4 % change on previous year | 12.63 % change on previous year | 33.77 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | -26.64 % change on previous year | 65.33 % change on previous year | 91.97 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Russian Federation or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Russian Federation as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
- 15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
- Russian Federation ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.