Angola vs Australia and New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues

Angola
7.12 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
8.21 million t
in 2024
Angola rank
4th
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd

Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Angola
  • Australia and New Zealand
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 8.21 million t against 7.12 million t in Angola, a difference of 1.09 million t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 4th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 219 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 4.99 million t 20.34 million t 15.35 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 10.78 million t 38.50 million t 27.71 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 6.21 million t 29.71 million t 23.50 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 5.43 million t 17.55 million t 12.13 million t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Angola or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 8.21 million t against 7.12 million t in Angola as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Angola and Australia and New Zealand?
1.09 million t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Australia and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Angola and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
Angola ranks 4th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Australia and New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/angola/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/angola/australia-and-new-zealand/">Angola vs Australia and New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.