Belarus vs Comoros: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Belarus
0 t
in 2024
Comoros
570.89 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Comoros rank
32nd
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Belarus
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 570.89 t against 0 t in Belarus, a difference of 570.89 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 34th and Comoros ranks 32nd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,342 t | 173.21 t | 2,169 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 132.66 t | 405.23 t | 272.57 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0 t | 228.36 t | 228.36 t | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0 t | 114.18 t | 114.18 t | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Belarus or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 570.89 t against 0 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Belarus and Comoros?
- 570.89 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Comoros?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Comoros rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Comoros ranks 32nd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.