China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 t
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
34th
Puerto Rico rank
34th

Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Puerto Rico
0200400600800199020072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Puerto Rico ranks 34th of 219 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 578.73 t 27.18 t 551.56 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 4.26 t 3.71 t 0.554 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Puerto Rico?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 t against 0 t in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico?
0 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Puerto Rico ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/puerto-rico-us/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.