Cuba vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Cuba
0 t
in 2024
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
34th
Libya rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Cuba
- Libya
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,131 t | 605.57 t | 7,525 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2,380 t | 0 t | 2,380 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 114.33 t | 0 t | 114.33 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 114.33 t | 0 t | 114.33 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Cuba or Libya?
- Cuba, at 0 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Cuba and Libya?
- 0 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Libya rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Cuba ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.