Ecuador vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Ecuador
570.6 t
in 2024
Eswatini
0 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
33rd
Eswatini rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Ecuador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 570.6 t against 0 t in Eswatini, a difference of 570.6 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,186 t | 8,709 t | 5,524 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 2,076 t | 8,188 t | 6,111 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 171.17 t | 1,659 t | 1,488 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 114.12 t | 0 t | 114.12 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Ecuador or Eswatini?
- Ecuador, at 570.6 t against 0 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 570.6 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.