Eritrea vs Mali: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Mali
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea rank
34th
Mali rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Eritrea
- Mali
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mali, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 34th and Mali ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,392 t | 731,738 t | 727,347 t | Mali |
| 2000s | 821.52 t | 84,369 t | 83,547 t | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Eritrea or Mali?
- Eritrea, at 0 t against 0 t in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Eritrea and Mali?
- 0 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Mali rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Eritrea ranks 34th and Mali ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.