Estonia vs Mongolia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Estonia
0 t
in 2024
Mongolia
0 t
in 2024
Estonia rank
34th
Mongolia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Estonia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mongolia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 34th and Mongolia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 128.22 t | 81,382 t | 81,254 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 12.02 t | 5,682 t | 5,670 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Estonia or Mongolia?
- Estonia, at 0 t against 0 t in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Estonia and Mongolia?
- 0 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mongolia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Mongolia rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Estonia ranks 34th and Mongolia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.