Eswatini vs Lithuania: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Eswatini
0 t
in 2024
Lithuania
0 t
in 2024
Eswatini rank
34th
Lithuania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Eswatini
- Lithuania
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,561 t | 39.22 t | 9,522 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 8,188 t | 4 t | 8,184 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,659 t | 0 t | 1,659 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Eswatini or Lithuania?
- Eswatini, at 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Eswatini and Lithuania?
- 0 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Lithuania rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Eswatini ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.