Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues

Guatemala
0 t
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 t
in 2024
Guatemala rank
34th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
34th

Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Guatemala
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020072024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 34th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 34th of 219 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 3,864 t 42.87 t 3,821 t Guatemala
2000s 576.92 t 114.33 t 462.59 t Guatemala
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Guatemala or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Guatemala, at 0 t against 0 t in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 t, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
Guatemala ranks 34th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/guatemala/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/guatemala/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.