Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
739,763 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
99,425 t
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Zimbabwe rank
12th

Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
05.0M10.0M15.0M199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 739,763 t against 99,425 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 640,338 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 7.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 9.60 million t 1.38 million t 8.22 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 6.37 million t 4.16 million t 2.21 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.54 million t 1.58 million t 1.96 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 880,855 t 300,875 t 579,980 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 739,763 t against 99,425 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
640,338 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.