Latvia vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Latvia rank
34th
Libya rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 251.83 t | 708.13 t | 456.3 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 23.59 t | 0 t | 23.59 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Latvia or Libya?
- Latvia, at 0 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Latvia and Libya?
- 0 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Latvia ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.