Libya vs Peru: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Peru
0 t
in 2024
Libya rank
34th
Peru rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Libya
- Peru
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Peru, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 605.57 t | 43,158 t | 42,552 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 0 t | 2,604 t | 2,604 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 t | 2,226 t | 2,226 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1,028 t | 1,028 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Libya or Peru?
- Libya, at 0 t against 0 t in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Libya and Peru?
- 0 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Peru rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Libya ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.