Mongolia vs Peru: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Mongolia
0 t
in 2024
Peru
0 t
in 2024
Mongolia rank
34th
Peru rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Peru, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,530 t | 43,158 t | 26,372 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 5,682 t | 2,604 t | 3,078 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 2,226 t | 2,226 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1,028 t | 1,028 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 0 t against 0 t in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Mongolia ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.