New Zealand vs Peru: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
New Zealand
0 t
in 2024
Peru
0 t
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Peru rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- New Zealand
- Peru
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Peru, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 472.93 t | 43,158 t | 42,685 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 243.21 t | 2,604 t | 2,361 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 t | 2,226 t | 2,226 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1,028 t | 1,028 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, New Zealand or Peru?
- New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between New Zealand and Peru?
- 0 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Peru rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.