Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues

Nicaragua
63,384 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
99,425 t
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
12th

Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Zimbabwe
02.0M4.0M6.0M199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 99,425 t against 63,384 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 36,041 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Nicaragua ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 219 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 19,564 t 1.38 million t 1.36 million t Zimbabwe
2000s 25,342 t 4.16 million t 4.13 million t Zimbabwe
2010s 12,963 t 1.58 million t 1.57 million t Zimbabwe
2020s 18,987 t 351,238 t 332,251 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Nicaragua or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 99,425 t against 63,384 t in Nicaragua as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
36,041 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
Nicaragua ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/nicaragua/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/nicaragua/zimbabwe/">Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.