Peru vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Peru
0 t
in 2024
Rwanda
0 t
in 2024
Peru rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Peru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43,158 t | 833.61 t | 42,324 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 2,604 t | 193.07 t | 2,411 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 2,226 t | 0 t | 2,226 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 1,028 t | 0 t | 1,028 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Peru or Rwanda?
- Peru, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Peru and Rwanda?
- 0 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Peru ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.