Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Puerto Rico
0 t
in 2024
Rwanda
0 t
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Puerto Rico
- Rwanda
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.18 t | 833.61 t | 806.44 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 3.71 t | 193.07 t | 189.37 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Puerto Rico or Rwanda?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Puerto Rico and Rwanda?
- 0 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Puerto Rico ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.