South Sudan vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
South Sudan
0 t
in 2024
Tunisia
0 t
in 2024
South Sudan rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- South Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tunisia ahead.
South Sudan ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.33 t | 573.34 t | 502.01 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 114.68 t | 114.68 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, South Sudan or Tunisia?
- South Sudan, at 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 0 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- South Sudan ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.